Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. CESTONI, 15-CR-416 WHA. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20160120870 Visitors: 10
Filed: Jan. 19, 2016
Latest Update: Jan. 19, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXCLUDE TIME UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT; [PROPOSED] ORDER WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . STIPULATION Plaintiff the United States of America, by and through Special Assistant United States Attorney Philip Kopczynski, Defendant Claudio Maciel, by and through his attorney John Forsyth, and Defendant Enzo Cestoni, by and through Assistant Federal Public Defender Ellen Leonida, hereby stipulate that, with the Court's approval, the time between January 12, 2016 and April 4, 2
More

STIPULATION TO EXCLUDE TIME UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT; [PROPOSED] ORDER

STIPULATION

Plaintiff the United States of America, by and through Special Assistant United States Attorney Philip Kopczynski, Defendant Claudio Maciel, by and through his attorney John Forsyth, and Defendant Enzo Cestoni, by and through Assistant Federal Public Defender Ellen Leonida, hereby stipulate that, with the Court's approval, the time between January 12, 2016 and April 4, 2016 is excludable under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv), for effective preparation by counsel, as stated on the record on January 12, 2016.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, upon stipulation of the parties,

THE COURT FINDS that failing to exclude the time between January 12, 2016 and April 4, 2016 would unreasonably deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv).

THE COURT FURTHER FINDS that the ends of justice served by excluding the time between January 12, 2016 and April 4, 2016 from computation under the Speedy Trial Act outweigh the interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial.

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the time between January 12, 2016 and April 4, 2016 shall be excluded from computation under the Speedy Trial Act.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer