Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Hyundai Motor Company v. Direct Technologies International, Inc., 3:17-cv-00732-MOC-DSC. (2018)

Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina Number: infdco20180501a34 Visitors: 6
Filed: Apr. 26, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 26, 2018
Summary: ORDER MAX O. COGBURN, JR. , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim on Which Relief Can be Granted Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). Having considered defendant's motion, plaintiffs' Opposition (#23), and defendant's Reply (#28), and reviewed the pleadings, the Court enters the following Order. ORDER IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim on Which Relief Can be Gran
More

ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the Court on defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim on Which Relief Can be Granted Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). Having considered defendant's motion, plaintiffs' Opposition (#23), and defendant's Reply (#28), and reviewed the pleadings, the Court enters the following Order.

ORDER

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim on Which Relief Can be Granted Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) (#19) is DENIED without prejudice as to defendant reasserting its substantive argument at summary judgment after the close of discovery.

The Court does note, as did defendant, that the Opposition is not accompanied by a Certificate of Service as required under L.Cv.R 5.3(c). While such is error, the Court will not dismiss the Complaint, as defendant suggests in its Reply, as it is readily apparent from the NEF that defendant was electronically served with a copy. Plaintiff shall, however, rectify the error by filing a Certificate of Service.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer