Filed: Feb. 24, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 24, 2020
Summary: ORDER MAX O. COGBURN, JR. , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on Second Unopposed Motions to Continue, filed by Defendants Luis Bravo (#84), Ivan Garcia (#88), and Ivan Trujillo, Sr. (#96). Having considered the matter, the Court enters the following Order. ORDER IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Second Unopposed Motions to Continue— filed by Defendants Luis Bravo (#84), Ivan Garcia (#88), and Ivan Trujillo, Sr. (#96)—are GRANTED, and this matter is continued to the n
Summary: ORDER MAX O. COGBURN, JR. , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on Second Unopposed Motions to Continue, filed by Defendants Luis Bravo (#84), Ivan Garcia (#88), and Ivan Trujillo, Sr. (#96). Having considered the matter, the Court enters the following Order. ORDER IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Second Unopposed Motions to Continue— filed by Defendants Luis Bravo (#84), Ivan Garcia (#88), and Ivan Trujillo, Sr. (#96)—are GRANTED, and this matter is continued to the ne..
More
ORDER
MAX O. COGBURN, JR., District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on Second Unopposed Motions to Continue, filed by Defendants Luis Bravo (#84), Ivan Garcia (#88), and Ivan Trujillo, Sr. (#96). Having considered the matter, the Court enters the following Order.
ORDER
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Second Unopposed Motions to Continue— filed by Defendants Luis Bravo (#84), Ivan Garcia (#88), and Ivan Trujillo, Sr. (#96)—are GRANTED, and this matter is continued to the next criminal term. The Court finds that the delay caused by this continuance shall be excluded in accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv), as failure to grant such a continuance would deny counsel for Defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. Also, the ends of justice served by granting such continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and Defendant in a speedy trial. Specifically, Defendant's counsel needs additional time to review discovery to prepare for trial or other resolution of this matter.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(6), this matter is continued as to the remaining co-defendants and the time is excluded as a reasonable period of delay as such defendants are joined with a co-defendant whose case has been continued from the term and as to whom the time for trial has not run and no motion for severance has been granted.
This matter is continued to the next criminal term, and the time is excluded. The time for filing pretrial motions is ENLARGED by 60 days from entry of this Order.