Cardoza v. Bloomin' Brands, Inc., 2:13-cv-01820-JAD-NJK. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20151030b37
Visitors: 13
Filed: Oct. 29, 2015
Latest Update: Oct. 29, 2015
Summary: PARTIES' JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER IN RESPONSE TO COURT'S ORDER (DOCKET NO. 384). NANCY J. KOPPE , District Judge . The parties now approach the Court in response to its Order on Plaintiffs' recent motion to compel. That Order can be found at Docket No. 384. In its Order, the Court ordered the parties to "confer in light of the guidance provided" in the Order, and to file a "joint stipulated proposal" for conduct of further discovery by October 30. The parties jointly propose to exten
Summary: PARTIES' JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER IN RESPONSE TO COURT'S ORDER (DOCKET NO. 384). NANCY J. KOPPE , District Judge . The parties now approach the Court in response to its Order on Plaintiffs' recent motion to compel. That Order can be found at Docket No. 384. In its Order, the Court ordered the parties to "confer in light of the guidance provided" in the Order, and to file a "joint stipulated proposal" for conduct of further discovery by October 30. The parties jointly propose to extend..
More
PARTIES' JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER IN RESPONSE TO COURT'S ORDER (DOCKET NO. 384).
NANCY J. KOPPE, District Judge.
The parties now approach the Court in response to its Order on Plaintiffs' recent motion to compel. That Order can be found at Docket No. 384.
In its Order, the Court ordered the parties to "confer in light of the guidance provided" in the Order, and to file a "joint stipulated proposal" for conduct of further discovery by October 30.
The parties jointly propose to extend this deadline two weeks, to November 13. As grounds for an extension, the parties state:
[] Consonant with the Court's guidance, the parties have engaged in multiple phone calls and exchanged letters and e-mails intended to resolving discovery matters without the Court's involvement.
[] There is a further meeting set for next week where plaintiff and defense counsel will sit down in person to further discuss discovery matters. The parties agree that an in-person meeting would be valuable in working through these issues in a collegial and cooperative manner.
[] Plaintiffs' counsel requested the additional time sought. Defendants' counsel agreed to the extension. Counsel for all parties believe that this additional time will be put to good use and that the extent of agreement between the parties appears greater if there is more time to work.
If the Court prefers a motion to be filed in lieu of a stipulation, the parties will do so promptly.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
