Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

BEECHAM v. ROSEVILLE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT, 2:15-CV-01022-KJM-EFB. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20170825e20 Visitors: 11
Filed: Aug. 22, 2017
Latest Update: Aug. 22, 2017
Summary: FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE SCHEDULING ORDER KIMBERLY J. MUELLER , District Judge . Defendants have filed ex parte applications (ECF Nos. 131-32) to amend dates in the pretrial scheduling order (ECF No. 27), which plaintiffs oppose (ECF No. 133). Good cause appearing, the court GRANTS this request in part, as follows: Description Existing Date New Date All Dispositive Motions June 23, 2017 September 22, 2017 File Joint Pretr
More

FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE SCHEDULING ORDER

Defendants have filed ex parte applications (ECF Nos. 131-32) to amend dates in the pretrial scheduling order (ECF No. 27), which plaintiffs oppose (ECF No. 133). Good cause appearing, the court GRANTS this request in part, as follows:

Description Existing Date New Date All Dispositive Motions June 23, 2017 September 22, 2017 File Joint Pretrial Conference Statement August 31, 2017 VACATED. To be set after court resolves any dispositive motions. Final Pretrial Conference September 22, 2017 VACATED. To be set after court resolves any dispositive motions. Trial Briefs Due November 13, 2017 VACATED. To be set after court resolves any dispositive motions. Trial November 26, 2017 VACATED. To be set after court resolves any dispositive motions.

This amendment does not alter any other portions of the initial scheduling order (ECF No. 27).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer