Walters v. Vitamin Shoppe Industries, Inc., 3:14-CV-01173-PK. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Oregon
Number: infdco20180530f51
Visitors: 7
Filed: May 29, 2018
Latest Update: May 29, 2018
Summary: ORDER ANNA J. BROWN , Senior District Judge . Magistrate Judge Paul Papak issued Findings and Recommendation (#74) on May 8, 2018, in which he recommends this Court grant in part and deny in part Defendant Vitamin Shoppe Industries, Inc.'s Motion (#60) to Dismiss and Strike Nationwide Class Claims and Allegations. The matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and R
Summary: ORDER ANNA J. BROWN , Senior District Judge . Magistrate Judge Paul Papak issued Findings and Recommendation (#74) on May 8, 2018, in which he recommends this Court grant in part and deny in part Defendant Vitamin Shoppe Industries, Inc.'s Motion (#60) to Dismiss and Strike Nationwide Class Claims and Allegations. The matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Re..
More
ORDER
ANNA J. BROWN, Senior District Judge.
Magistrate Judge Paul Papak issued Findings and Recommendation (#74) on May 8, 2018, in which he recommends this Court grant in part and deny in part Defendant Vitamin Shoppe Industries, Inc.'s Motion (#60) to Dismiss and Strike Nationwide Class Claims and Allegations. The matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, this Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. See Decker v. Berryhill, 856 F.3d 659, 663 (9th Cir. 2017). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court does not find any error.
CONCLUSION
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Papak's Findings and Recommendation (#74) and, accordingly, GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendant's Motion (#60) to Dismiss and Strike as follows: The Court GRANTS without prejudice Defendant's Motion to Strike Plaintiff's nationwide class-action allegations and the Court DENIES Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's claim for prospective injunctive relief. The Court returns this matter to the Magistrate Judge for further handling.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
