RAVEN-JONES v. BERRYHILL, 3:16-cv-03766-LB. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20170227947
Visitors: 13
Filed: Feb. 23, 2017
Latest Update: Feb. 23, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR A FIRST EXTENSION FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE REPLY TO DEFENDANT'S CROSS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT LAUREL BEELER , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that Plaintiff shall have a first extension of time of twenty-one days to file her reply to Defendant's motion for summary judgment. The current due date is February 27, 2017. The new due date will be March 20, 2017. This is the f
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR A FIRST EXTENSION FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE REPLY TO DEFENDANT'S CROSS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT LAUREL BEELER , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that Plaintiff shall have a first extension of time of twenty-one days to file her reply to Defendant's motion for summary judgment. The current due date is February 27, 2017. The new due date will be March 20, 2017. This is the fi..
More
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR A FIRST EXTENSION FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE REPLY TO DEFENDANT'S CROSS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
LAUREL BEELER, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that Plaintiff shall have a first extension of time of twenty-one days to file her reply to Defendant's motion for summary judgment. The current due date is February 27, 2017. The new due date will be March 20, 2017.
This is the first continuance sought by Plaintiff. There is good cause for this request. Plaintiff seeks this extension due to counsel's heavy workload, including her administrative hearing caseload with the Social Security Administration.
Plaintiff apologizes for any inconvenience caused by this delay. Defendant does not object and agrees that all subsequent filing deadlines should be extended accordingly.
PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:
FootNotes
1. Nancy A. Berryhill is now the Acting Commissioner of Social Security. Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Nancy A. Berryhill should be substituted for Acting Commissioner Carolyn W. Colvin as the defendant in this suit. No further action needs to be taken to continue this suit by reason of the last sentence of section 205(g) of the Social Security Action, 42 U.S.C. §405(g)."
Source: Leagle
