BUCHLA v. BUCHLA ELECTRONIC MUSICAL INSTRUMENT, LLC, 3:15-VC-00921-HSG. (2015)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20150515b53
Visitors: 20
Filed: May 14, 2015
Latest Update: May 14, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION Pursuant to L.R. 6-1(b), 6-2(a), and 7-12 HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, Jr. , District Judge . Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1(b), 6-2(a), and 7-12, Plaintiff and Defendants respectfully request that the Court extend the briefing schedule for Defendants' Motion to Compel Arbitration, which is noticed for hearing on July 9, 2015. ECF No. 27. The parties seek to extend Plaintiff's deadline to
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION Pursuant to L.R. 6-1(b), 6-2(a), and 7-12 HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, Jr. , District Judge . Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1(b), 6-2(a), and 7-12, Plaintiff and Defendants respectfully request that the Court extend the briefing schedule for Defendants' Motion to Compel Arbitration, which is noticed for hearing on July 9, 2015. ECF No. 27. The parties seek to extend Plaintiff's deadline to r..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION
Pursuant to L.R. 6-1(b), 6-2(a), and 7-12
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, Jr., District Judge.
Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1(b), 6-2(a), and 7-12, Plaintiff and Defendants respectfully request that the Court extend the briefing schedule for Defendants' Motion to Compel Arbitration, which is noticed for hearing on July 9, 2015. ECF No. 27. The parties seek to extend Plaintiff's deadline to respond to Defendants' Motion from May 14, 2015 to May 21, 2015, and Defendants' deadline to reply to Plaintiff's Opposition from May 21, 2015 to June 4, 2015. The proposed extension will provide both Plaintiff and Defendants with one additional week to prepare their briefs, consult with their respective clients, and, if necessary, review and analyze evidence that may be relevant to Defendants' Motion. There have been no prior time modifications in connection with Defendants' Motion, and the requested enlargement will have no apparent effect on the schedule for the case.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
[PROPOSED] ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
