Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Gaspar Bishop, 11-12462 (2012)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 11-12462 Visitors: 13
Filed: Sep. 10, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: Case: 11-12462 Date Filed: 09/10/2012 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 11-12462 Non-Argument Calendar _ D. C. Docket No. 4:10-cr-00096-RH-WCS-3 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus GASPAR BISHOP, a.k.a. Nigel Humphrey, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (September 10, 2012) Before HULL, MARTIN and HILL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Randolph P. M
More
              Case: 11-12462    Date Filed: 09/10/2012   Page: 1 of 2

                                                             [DO NOT PUBLISH]


               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                         FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                           ________________________

                                No. 11-12462
                            Non-Argument Calendar
                          ________________________

                   D. C. Docket No. 4:10-cr-00096-RH-WCS-3

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                      versus

GASPAR BISHOP,
a.k.a. Nigel Humphrey,

                                                             Defendant-Appellant.

                          ________________________

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Northern District of Florida
                         _________________________

                               (September 10, 2012)

Before HULL, MARTIN and HILL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

      Randolph P. Murrell, appointed counsel for Gaspar Bishop, in this direct

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
              Case: 11-12462     Date Filed: 09/10/2012   Page: 2 of 2

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
 (1967). We have reviewed both counsel’s brief and

Bishop’s response. Our independent review of the entire record reveals that

counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Bishops’s convictions and

sentences are AFFIRMED.




                                          2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer