Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

VAN v. ASSET VENTURES, 2:15-cv-01401-JAD-PAL. (2016)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20160105988 Visitors: 10
Filed: Jan. 04, 2016
Latest Update: Jan. 04, 2016
Summary: ORDER (Subst Atty — Dkt. #38) PEGGY A. LEEN , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the Substitution of Attorney (Dkt. #38) and Errata (Dkt #39) filed December 31, 2015. Steven C. Devney of Devney Law Firm seeks leave to be substituted in the place and stead of Casey D. Gish of The Law Office of Casey D. Gish for Plaintiffs Sandy Van and Judy Van. LR IA 10-6 provides that the signature of an attorney to substitute in a case "constitutes an express acceptance of all dates the
More

ORDER (Subst Atty — Dkt. #38)

This matter is before the court on the Substitution of Attorney (Dkt. #38) and Errata (Dkt #39) filed December 31, 2015. Steven C. Devney of Devney Law Firm seeks leave to be substituted in the place and stead of Casey D. Gish of The Law Office of Casey D. Gish for Plaintiffs Sandy Van and Judy Van. LR IA 10-6 provides that the signature of an attorney to substitute in a case "constitutes an express acceptance of all dates then set for pretrial proceedings, for trial or hearing, by the discovery plan, or in any court order." LR IA 10-6(d) also provides that the substitution of an attorney "shall not alone be reason for delay of pretrial proceedings, discovery, the trial, or any hearing in this case."

Having reviewed and considered the matter, and good cause appearing,

IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The Substitution of Attorney (Dkt. #38) is APPROVED. 2. Steven C. Devney of Devney Law Firm is substituted in the place of Casey D. Gish of The Law Office of Casey D. Gish, for Plaintiffs Sandy Van and Judy Van, subject to the provisions of LR IA 10-6(c) and (d).
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer