Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Martinez-Grande, CR 19-1615-LAB. (2019)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20190628a70 Visitors: 19
Filed: Jun. 27, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 27, 2019
Summary: CONTINUING MOTIONS HEARING AND SPEEDY TRIAL FINDINGS LARRY ALAN BURNS , Chief District Judge . Good cause having been shown, the motions hearings are continued to July 15, 2019 at 2:30 p.m. Further, the time period of June 25, 2019 to July 15, 2019, inclusive, should be excluded pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(7)(A), (h)(7)(B)(i), (h)(7)(B)(ii), and (B)(iv) because the requested continuance results from a continuance granted by the Court on the basis of the Court's finding tha
More

CONTINUING MOTIONS HEARING AND SPEEDY TRIAL FINDINGS

Good cause having been shown, the motions hearings are continued to July 15, 2019 at 2:30 p.m. Further, the time period of June 25, 2019 to July 15, 2019, inclusive, should be excluded pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A), (h)(7)(B)(i), (h)(7)(B)(ii), and (B)(iv) because the requested continuance results from a continuance granted by the Court on the basis of the Court's finding that: (i) the ends of justice served by the continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and defendants in a speedy trial; (ii) failure to grant the continuance would be likely to make a continuation of the proceeding impossible, or result in a miscarriage of justice; and (iii) failure to grant the continuance would unreasonably deny defendant continuity of counsel and would deny defense counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer