STAR FABRICS, INC. v. PERFECT INK, INC., CV 17-2949 FMO (Ex). (2017)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20170818a85
Visitors: 2
Filed: Aug. 17, 2017
Latest Update: Aug. 17, 2017
Summary: ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE FERNANDO M. OLGUIN , District Judge . Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, plaintiff Star Fabrics, Inc. ("plaintiff") dismissed without prejudice defendants Azules and Hadari Power Fashion House Inc. ( See Dkt. 12, Notice of Dismissal of Azules; Dkt. 16, Notice of Dismissal of Hadari Power Fashion House Inc.). Having been advised by counsel that plaintiff has settled its claims with the last remaining defendant,
Summary: ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE FERNANDO M. OLGUIN , District Judge . Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, plaintiff Star Fabrics, Inc. ("plaintiff") dismissed without prejudice defendants Azules and Hadari Power Fashion House Inc. ( See Dkt. 12, Notice of Dismissal of Azules; Dkt. 16, Notice of Dismissal of Hadari Power Fashion House Inc.). Having been advised by counsel that plaintiff has settled its claims with the last remaining defendant, ..
More
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE
FERNANDO M. OLGUIN, District Judge.
Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, plaintiff Star Fabrics, Inc. ("plaintiff") dismissed without prejudice defendants Azules and Hadari Power Fashion House Inc. (See Dkt. 12, Notice of Dismissal of Azules; Dkt. 16, Notice of Dismissal of Hadari Power Fashion House Inc.).
Having been advised by counsel that plaintiff has settled its claims with the last remaining defendant, Perfect Ink, Inc., (see Dkt. 13, Notice of Settlement with Perfect Ink, Inc.), IT IS ORDERED that the above-captioned action is hereby dismissed without costs and without prejudice to the right, upon good cause shown within 30 days from the filing date of this Order, to re-open the action if settlement is not consummated. The court retains full jurisdiction over this action and this Order shall not prejudice any party to this action.
Source: Leagle
