Massimo v. Commissioner of Social Security, 2:18-CV-0086-CMK. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180823b29
Visitors: 12
Filed: Aug. 22, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 22, 2018
Summary: ORDER CRAIG M. KELLISON , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff, who is proceeding with retained counsel, brings this action under 42 U.S.C. 405(g) for judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security. On August 10, 2018, the court directed plaintiff to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to notify the court regarding consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge. A review of the docket reflects that plaintiff has now complied. The order to show
Summary: ORDER CRAIG M. KELLISON , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff, who is proceeding with retained counsel, brings this action under 42 U.S.C. 405(g) for judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security. On August 10, 2018, the court directed plaintiff to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to notify the court regarding consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge. A review of the docket reflects that plaintiff has now complied. The order to show ..
More
ORDER
CRAIG M. KELLISON, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff, who is proceeding with retained counsel, brings this action under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security. On August 10, 2018, the court directed plaintiff to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to notify the court regarding consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge. A review of the docket reflects that plaintiff has now complied. The order to show cause is, therefore, discharged.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
