BIERLING v. COLVIN, 14-cv-02873-JLK. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Colorado
Number: infdco20150304b22
Visitors: 11
Filed: Mar. 03, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2015
Summary: ORDER JOHN L. KANE , Senior District Judge . Upon consideration of Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Remand Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g) (Doc. 13), and for good cause appearing, ORDERED that the Commissioner's decision is REVERSED under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g) 1 and the case REMANDED to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings, as follows: On remand, the Appeals Council will remand the matter to an administrative law judge (ALJ) for furth
Summary: ORDER JOHN L. KANE , Senior District Judge . Upon consideration of Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Remand Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g) (Doc. 13), and for good cause appearing, ORDERED that the Commissioner's decision is REVERSED under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g) 1 and the case REMANDED to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings, as follows: On remand, the Appeals Council will remand the matter to an administrative law judge (ALJ) for furthe..
More
ORDER
JOHN L. KANE, Senior District Judge.
Upon consideration of Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Remand Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (Doc. 13), and for good cause appearing,
ORDERED that the Commissioner's decision is REVERSED under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g)1 and the case REMANDED to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings, as follows:
On remand, the Appeals Council will remand the matter to an administrative law judge (ALJ) for further evaluation of the record and a new decision. The Appeals Council will direct the ALJ to:
• Further evaluate the medical source opinions of record, including those of Drs. Cookson and Suyeishi;
• Further evaluate Plaintiff's RFC;
• Further evaluate the credibility of Plaintiff's subjective complaints;
• Further evaluate whether Plaintiff's conditions meets or medically equals a Listing;
• Further evaluate Plaintiff's substance abuse pursuant to Social Security Ruling 13-2p; and
• Obtain medical expert evidence.
FootNotes
1. The Clerk of the Court will enter a separate judgment pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 58, consistent with Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 296-302 (1993).
Source: Leagle
