JOHNSON v. ALTAMIRA CORPORATION, 16-CV-05335-LHK. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20170417781
Visitors: 6
Filed: Apr. 14, 2017
Latest Update: Apr. 14, 2017
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT DEFAULT JUDGMENT Re: Dkt. Nos. 14, 17 LUCY H. KOH , District Judge . This is a disability access case that was assigned to Magistrate Judge Nathanael Cousins. On November 10, 2016, the Clerk entered default against Defendant. ECF No. 9. On February 7, 2017, Plaintiff moved for default judgment against Defendant. ECF No. 14. Defendant did not respond to Plaintiff's motion for default judgment and still has not appeared in the instant case. O
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT DEFAULT JUDGMENT Re: Dkt. Nos. 14, 17 LUCY H. KOH , District Judge . This is a disability access case that was assigned to Magistrate Judge Nathanael Cousins. On November 10, 2016, the Clerk entered default against Defendant. ECF No. 9. On February 7, 2017, Plaintiff moved for default judgment against Defendant. ECF No. 14. Defendant did not respond to Plaintiff's motion for default judgment and still has not appeared in the instant case. On..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT DEFAULT JUDGMENT
Re: Dkt. Nos. 14, 17
LUCY H. KOH, District Judge.
This is a disability access case that was assigned to Magistrate Judge Nathanael Cousins. On November 10, 2016, the Clerk entered default against Defendant. ECF No. 9. On February 7, 2017, Plaintiff moved for default judgment against Defendant. ECF No. 14. Defendant did not respond to Plaintiff's motion for default judgment and still has not appeared in the instant case. On March 27, 2017, Judge Cousins issued a Report and Recommendation to Grant Default Judgment and ordered the reassignment of the instant case to a District Judge. ECF No. 17. On March 28, 2017, the instant case was reassigned to the undersigned judge. ECF No. 18.
No objections to Judge Cousins' Report and Recommendation have been filed, and the time to file objections has expired. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2).
Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation, as well as the record in this case, the Court finds that the Report and Recommendation is well-founded in fact and in law and, therefore, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
