Filed: Oct. 09, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 09, 2018
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING CONTINUANCE OF JANUARY 2, 2019 INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . STIPULATION Plaintiff Darren Eastman, in pro se, and Defendant Apple Inc. ("Apple"), through its counsel of record, and subject to the approval of the Court, hereby agree and stipulate as follows: 1. On October 2, 2018, the Court set the Initial Case Management Conference for January 2, 2019. Dkt. 10. 2. Lead counsel for Apple has a s
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING CONTINUANCE OF JANUARY 2, 2019 INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . STIPULATION Plaintiff Darren Eastman, in pro se, and Defendant Apple Inc. ("Apple"), through its counsel of record, and subject to the approval of the Court, hereby agree and stipulate as follows: 1. On October 2, 2018, the Court set the Initial Case Management Conference for January 2, 2019. Dkt. 10. 2. Lead counsel for Apple has a sc..
More
JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING CONTINUANCE OF JANUARY 2, 2019 INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
JON S. TIGAR, District Judge.
STIPULATION
Plaintiff Darren Eastman, in pro se, and Defendant Apple Inc. ("Apple"), through its counsel of record, and subject to the approval of the Court, hereby agree and stipulate as follows:
1. On October 2, 2018, the Court set the Initial Case Management Conference for January 2, 2019. Dkt. 10.
2. Lead counsel for Apple has a scheduling conflict that will preclude his in-person attendance at the Initial Case Management Conference as currently scheduled. Counsel for Apple informed Plaintiff of this scheduling conflict on October 3, 2018.
3. In view of the foregoing, good cause exists, and Plaintiff and Apple respectfully ask the Court, to reset the Initial Case Management Conference—currently scheduled for January 2, 2019—for January 9, 2019 at 2 p.m. or for a subsequent date more convenient for the Court.
SO STIPULATED.
