Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Zimmerman v. UBS AG, 17CV4503-JMF. (2020)

Court: District Court, S.D. New York Number: infdco20200225c01 Visitors: 5
Filed: Feb. 24, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 24, 2020
Summary: [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT JESSE M. FURMAN , District Judge . The above-captioned matter having been adjudicated before the Honorable Jesse M. Furman, United States District Judge; and The Court, in an Opinion and Order dated August 24, 2018 (Docket Entry No. 101, the "Order"), having granted the motions of Defendants Ernst & Young ("EY") and UBS AG, UBS Americas Holding L.L.C., UBS Financial Services, Inc., UBS Group AG, UBS Securities, L.L.C., Axel Weber, Beatrice Weder di Mauro, Michel Dema
More

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT

The above-captioned matter having been adjudicated before the Honorable Jesse M. Furman, United States District Judge; and

The Court, in an Opinion and Order dated August 24, 2018 (Docket Entry No. 101, the "Order"), having granted the motions of Defendants Ernst & Young ("EY") and UBS AG, UBS Americas Holding L.L.C., UBS Financial Services, Inc., UBS Group AG, UBS Securities, L.L.C., Axel Weber, Beatrice Weder di Mauro, Michel Demare, Markus Diethelm, Sergio Ermotti, Reto Francioni, Ann Godbeher, Robert McCann, Tom Naratil, William Parrett, Isabelle Romy (the "UBS Defendants") to dismiss the amended complaint of Plaintiff Robert Zimmerman ("Plaintiff"), as well as the motion of Defendants Walt Bettinger, Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. and Charles Schwab (the "Schwab Defendants" and, with EY and the UBS Defendants, "Defendants") to compel arbitration of Plaintiff's claims; and

Plaintiff having subsequently appealed this Court's Order on October 22, 2018 (docket Entry No. 105), which appeal was dismissed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for lack of jurisdiction on January 14, 2020; and

Plaintiff having thereafter requested that this Court "dismiss all defendants in this action and issue an Order of Final Judgment dismissing this action" and also having indicated that neither he nor the Schwab Defendants pursued arbitration of his claims (Docket Entry Nos. 106, 107); and

Defendants having determined that they do not oppose the entry of a final judgment of dismissal; and

Plaintiff having indicated that he does not intend to pursue arbitration of any of his claims, it is hereby:

ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that:

1. All of Plaintiff's claims against all Defendants are dismissed with prejudice; and

2. Each party shall bear its own costs.

The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to terminate all parties and close this case, and to mail a copy of this judgment to Plaintiff.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer