CAP EXPORT, LLC v. ZINUS, INC., 2:16-cv-00371 SVW (MRWx). (2016)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20170118i23
Visitors: 11
Filed: Dec. 28, 2016
Latest Update: Dec. 28, 2016
Summary: JUDGMENT STEPHEN V. WILSON , District Judge . As the Court, having heard the merits of the parties' positions on Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, has made its ruling on the motion IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that: 1. Claims 1 and 3 of the U.S. Patent, No. 8,931,123, ("the '123 Patent") are invalid under 35 U.S.C. 103(a); 2. Plaintiff is determined to be the prevailing party and are entitled to judgment in their favor on their Complaint; and 3. Defendants' Counterclaims and Third Par
Summary: JUDGMENT STEPHEN V. WILSON , District Judge . As the Court, having heard the merits of the parties' positions on Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, has made its ruling on the motion IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that: 1. Claims 1 and 3 of the U.S. Patent, No. 8,931,123, ("the '123 Patent") are invalid under 35 U.S.C. 103(a); 2. Plaintiff is determined to be the prevailing party and are entitled to judgment in their favor on their Complaint; and 3. Defendants' Counterclaims and Third Part..
More
JUDGMENT
STEPHEN V. WILSON, District Judge.
As the Court, having heard the merits of the parties' positions on Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, has made its ruling on the motion
IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that:
1. Claims 1 and 3 of the U.S. Patent, No. 8,931,123, ("the '123 Patent") are invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a);
2. Plaintiff is determined to be the prevailing party and are entitled to judgment in their favor on their Complaint; and
3. Defendants' Counterclaims and Third Party Claims are dismissed with prejudice.
Source: Leagle
