Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

UTLEY v. ACEVEDO, 1:15-cv-01086-DAD-SAB. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20160624772 Visitors: 34
Filed: Jun. 23, 2016
Latest Update: Jun. 23, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES TO MODIFY DISCOVERY SCHEDULE STANLEY A. BOONE , Magistrate Judge . The parties herein, by and through counsel, stipulate as follows: 1. Plaintiff intends to take the depositions of witnesses Garza and Kennison. 2. The witnesses are not available prior to the discovery cut-off date of June 30, 2016. 3. The witnesses are available prior to July 14, 2016. 4. Based on the foregoing, the parties agree to extend the discovery period until July 14, 2016, for the sole
More

STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES TO MODIFY DISCOVERY SCHEDULE

The parties herein, by and through counsel, stipulate as follows:

1. Plaintiff intends to take the depositions of witnesses Garza and Kennison. 2. The witnesses are not available prior to the discovery cut-off date of June 30, 2016. 3. The witnesses are available prior to July 14, 2016. 4. Based on the foregoing, the parties agree to extend the discovery period until July 14, 2016, for the sole purpose of deposing witnesses Garza and Kennison. So stipulated.

ORDER

The Court having reviewed the Stipulation Of The Parties To Modify Discovery Schedule, and good cause having been found, the scheduling order is modified as follows:

Deadline for Non-Expert Discovery, for the purpose of allowing Plaintiff to take the depositions of witnesses Garza and Kennison, is moved from June 30, 2016, to July 14, 2016.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer