Klotz v. Saul, 2:17-cv-453. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Utah
Number: infdco20190830e48
Visitors: 13
Filed: Aug. 29, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 29, 2019
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ROBERT J. SHELBY , Chief District Judge . The undersigned referred this case to Magistrate Judge Brooke C. Wells pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B), 1 and the case was reassigned to Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero on June 11, 2019. 2 On August 12, 2019, Judge Romero issued a Report and Recommendation. 3 Judge Romero recommends denying Plaintiff's motion to reopen briefing because the arguments Plaintiff wishes to raise are untimely. 4 Neithe
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ROBERT J. SHELBY , Chief District Judge . The undersigned referred this case to Magistrate Judge Brooke C. Wells pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B), 1 and the case was reassigned to Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero on June 11, 2019. 2 On August 12, 2019, Judge Romero issued a Report and Recommendation. 3 Judge Romero recommends denying Plaintiff's motion to reopen briefing because the arguments Plaintiff wishes to raise are untimely. 4 Neither..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
ROBERT J. SHELBY, Chief District Judge.
The undersigned referred this case to Magistrate Judge Brooke C. Wells pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B),1 and the case was reassigned to Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero on June 11, 2019.2 On August 12, 2019, Judge Romero issued a Report and Recommendation.3 Judge Romero recommends denying Plaintiff's motion to reopen briefing because the arguments Plaintiff wishes to raise are untimely.4 Neither party objects to Judge Romero's Report and Recommendation, so the court reviews the Report and Recommendation for clear error.5
Having carefully considered Judge Romero's Report and Recommendation, the court finds no clear error. The court therefore ADOPTS Judge Romero's Report and Recommendation and DENIES Plaintiff's Motion.6
SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Dkt. 22.
2. Dkt. 33.
3. Dkt. 35.
4. Id. at 2-4.
5. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) advisory committee's note (1983) (citing Campbell v. U.S. Dist. Court for N. Dist. of Cal., 501 F.2d 196, 206 (9th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 879).
6. Dkt. 27.
Source: Leagle
