Filed: Nov. 15, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 15, 2017
Summary: ORDER RE: PENDING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION MICHAEL M. BAYLSON , District Judge . AND NOW, this 15th day of November, 2017, upon consideration of the Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed by Plaintiff City of Philadelphia (the "City" or "Philadelphia"), Defendant's opposition thereto, and the arguments of counsel, it is hereby ORDERED that Philadelphia's Motion is GRANTED. It is ORDERED that Defendant and his assistants, deputies, agents, designees, and subordinates, as w
Summary: ORDER RE: PENDING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION MICHAEL M. BAYLSON , District Judge . AND NOW, this 15th day of November, 2017, upon consideration of the Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed by Plaintiff City of Philadelphia (the "City" or "Philadelphia"), Defendant's opposition thereto, and the arguments of counsel, it is hereby ORDERED that Philadelphia's Motion is GRANTED. It is ORDERED that Defendant and his assistants, deputies, agents, designees, and subordinates, as we..
More
ORDER RE: PENDING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
MICHAEL M. BAYLSON, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 15th day of November, 2017, upon consideration of the Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed by Plaintiff City of Philadelphia (the "City" or "Philadelphia"), Defendant's opposition thereto, and the arguments of counsel, it is hereby ORDERED that Philadelphia's Motion is GRANTED.
It is ORDERED that Defendant and his assistants, deputies, agents, designees, and subordinates, as well as any person acting in concert or participation with them, are enjoined from rejecting Philadelphia's FY 2017 application for Byrne JAG funding or withholding any FY 2017 Byrne JAG funding from Philadelphia based on Philadelphia's certification of compliance with 8 U.S.C. § 1373. The City has demonstrated a likelihood of success on its claim that it substantially complies with Section 1373 as lawfully and constitutionally construed.
