IN RE JUNO THERAPEUTICS, INC., C16-1069 RSM. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Washington
Number: infdco20170419a84
Visitors: 10
Filed: Mar. 31, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 31, 2017
Summary: ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION PURSUANT TO LCR 7(f) TO FILE OVER-LENGTH BRIEF RICARDO S. MARTINEZ , Chief District Judge . This matter is before the Court on Defendants Juno Therapeutics, Inc. ("Juno"), Hans Bishop, Dr. Steven Harr, and Dr. Mark J. Gilbert's (collectively, "Defendants") motion to file an over-length reply brief in support of their motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint. Having considered the motion and good cause appearing, the Court h
Summary: ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION PURSUANT TO LCR 7(f) TO FILE OVER-LENGTH BRIEF RICARDO S. MARTINEZ , Chief District Judge . This matter is before the Court on Defendants Juno Therapeutics, Inc. ("Juno"), Hans Bishop, Dr. Steven Harr, and Dr. Mark J. Gilbert's (collectively, "Defendants") motion to file an over-length reply brief in support of their motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint. Having considered the motion and good cause appearing, the Court he..
More
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION PURSUANT TO LCR 7(f) TO FILE OVER-LENGTH BRIEF
RICARDO S. MARTINEZ, Chief District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendants Juno Therapeutics, Inc. ("Juno"), Hans Bishop, Dr. Steven Harr, and Dr. Mark J. Gilbert's (collectively, "Defendants") motion to file an over-length reply brief in support of their motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint.
Having considered the motion and good cause appearing, the Court hereby ORDERS as follows:
1. The Court GRANTS Defendants' motion. Defendants may file a reply in support of their motion to dismiss of no more than fifteen (15) pages.
Source: Leagle
