Moralez v. Kmart Corporation, 4:18-cv-02046 YGR. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20180529827
Visitors: 10
Filed: May 25, 2018
Latest Update: May 25, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS , District Judge . Counsel for the parties have met and conferred in good faith to continue the deadline for Defendants to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint ("Complaint"). This extension will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by Court Order. Defendants have sought one previous extension. As such, the parties have agreed to provide an additional thirty (30) d
Summary: STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS , District Judge . Counsel for the parties have met and conferred in good faith to continue the deadline for Defendants to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint ("Complaint"). This extension will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by Court Order. Defendants have sought one previous extension. As such, the parties have agreed to provide an additional thirty (30) da..
More
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS, District Judge.
Counsel for the parties have met and conferred in good faith to continue the deadline for Defendants to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint ("Complaint"). This extension will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by Court Order. Defendants have sought one previous extension. As such, the parties have agreed to provide an additional thirty (30) days from May 25, 2018 to June 25, 2018 for Defendants to respond to the complaint. No further extensions will be granted absent good cause.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Source: Leagle
