Kimmons v. Avilar, 14-cv-00954-JD (NJV). (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20171030h06
Visitors: 19
Filed: Oct. 23, 2017
Latest Update: Oct. 23, 2017
Summary: REPORT OF PRO SE PRISONER EARLY SETTLEMENT PROCEEDING NANDOR J. VADAS , Magistrate Judge . A settlement conference was held on October 19, 2017, and the results of that proceeding are indicated below: (1) The following individuals, parties, and/or representatives participated in the proceeding, and each possessed the requisite settlement authority: (X) Plaintiff, Branlett Eugene Kimmons, Pro Se. ( ) Warden of warden's representative ( ) Office of the California Attorney General (X) Oth
Summary: REPORT OF PRO SE PRISONER EARLY SETTLEMENT PROCEEDING NANDOR J. VADAS , Magistrate Judge . A settlement conference was held on October 19, 2017, and the results of that proceeding are indicated below: (1) The following individuals, parties, and/or representatives participated in the proceeding, and each possessed the requisite settlement authority: (X) Plaintiff, Branlett Eugene Kimmons, Pro Se. ( ) Warden of warden's representative ( ) Office of the California Attorney General (X) Othe..
More
REPORT OF PRO SE PRISONER EARLY SETTLEMENT PROCEEDING
NANDOR J. VADAS, Magistrate Judge.
A settlement conference was held on October 19, 2017, and the results of that proceeding are indicated below:
(1) The following individuals, parties, and/or representatives participated in the proceeding, and each possessed the requisite settlement authority:
(X) Plaintiff, Branlett Eugene Kimmons, Pro Se.
( ) Warden of warden's representative
( ) Office of the California Attorney General
(X) Other: Peter J. Hirsig, Adam C. Young and, for CDCR, Brad Smith.
(2) The following individuals, parties, and/or representatives did not appear:
(3) The outcome of the proceeding was:
( ) The case has been completely settled. The parties agree that a proposed stipulated order for dismissal of this case will be filed with the Court on __________________.
( ) The case has been partially resolved and counsel for defendants shall file a joint stipulation regarding those claims which have been resolved. The issues outlined on the sheet attached remain for this Court to resolve.
(X) The parties are unable to reach an agreement at this time.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle