Debra T. v. Saul, 3:18cv878. (2020)
Court: District Court, N.D. Indiana
Number: infdco20200219e39
Visitors: 29
Filed: Feb. 14, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 14, 2020
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER WILLIAM C. LEE , District Judge . This matter is before the court on a Report and Recommendation submitted by Magistrate Judge Susan L. Collins, on January 29, 2020. This Report and Recommendation was submitted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(C). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), the parties had fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy of this Recommendation to file written objections thereto with the Clerk of Court. The failure to file a timely objection resu
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER WILLIAM C. LEE , District Judge . This matter is before the court on a Report and Recommendation submitted by Magistrate Judge Susan L. Collins, on January 29, 2020. This Report and Recommendation was submitted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(C). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), the parties had fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy of this Recommendation to file written objections thereto with the Clerk of Court. The failure to file a timely objection resul..
More
OPINION AND ORDER
WILLIAM C. LEE, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on a Report and Recommendation submitted by Magistrate Judge Susan L. Collins, on January 29, 2020.
This Report and Recommendation was submitted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the parties had fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy of this Recommendation to file written objections thereto with the Clerk of Court. The failure to file a timely objection results in waiver of the right to challenge the Recommendation before either the District Court or the Court of Appeals. Willis v. Caterpillar, Inc., 199 F.3d 902, 904 (7th Cir. 1999); Hunger v. Leininger, 15 F.3d 664, 668 (7th Cir. 1994); The Provident Bank v. Manor Steel Corp., 882 F.2d 258, 260-261 (7th Cir. 1989); Lebovitz v. Miller, 856 F.2d 902, 905 n.2 (7th Cir. 1988).
No objections were filed within the 14-day time limit. Accordingly, this Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation.
Conclusion
As set forth in Magistrate Judge Collins's Report and Recommendation, the Decision of the Commissioner is hereby REVERSED AND REMANDED to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation.
FootNotes
1. For privacy purposes, Plaintiff's full name will not be used in this Order.
Source: Leagle
