IN RE STONE & WEBSTER INCORPORATED, 00-02142 (PJW). (2012)
Court: United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware
Number: inbco20120105721
Visitors: 2
Filed: Jan. 05, 2012
Latest Update: Jan. 05, 2012
Summary: PETER J. WALSH, Bankruptcy Judge. Dear Counsel: This is with respect to Travelers's request (Doc. # 6605) for an extension of time to respond to the Trustee's summary judgment motion. Ordinarily, I do not schedule dispositive motions hearings in advance of completion of briefing. After the briefing is completed by the reply brief, if any, any party may request an oral argument date. I do not decide whether I need an oral argument until I have completed my review of the briefs. In most cases,
Summary: PETER J. WALSH, Bankruptcy Judge. Dear Counsel: This is with respect to Travelers's request (Doc. # 6605) for an extension of time to respond to the Trustee's summary judgment motion. Ordinarily, I do not schedule dispositive motions hearings in advance of completion of briefing. After the briefing is completed by the reply brief, if any, any party may request an oral argument date. I do not decide whether I need an oral argument until I have completed my review of the briefs. In most cases, I..
More
PETER J. WALSH, Bankruptcy Judge.
Dear Counsel:
This is with respect to Travelers's request (Doc. # 6605) for an extension of time to respond to the Trustee's summary judgment motion.
Ordinarily, I do not schedule dispositive motions hearings in advance of completion of briefing. After the briefing is completed by the reply brief, if any, any party may request an oral argument date. I do not decide whether I need an oral argument until I have completed my review of the briefs. In most cases, I do not schedule an oral argument.
In the matter before me I believe that a 30-day extension from today is sufficient for Travelers' response to the summary judgment motion.
Source: Leagle
