SEWELL v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY, 15-2405. (2015)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20151223080
Visitors: 19
Filed: Dec. 23, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 23, 2015
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM : Starsha Sewell appeals the district court's orders dismissing this action without prejudice for failure to serve process and denying her motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Sewell v. Washington Metro. Area Transit Auth., No. 8:
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM : Starsha Sewell appeals the district court's orders dismissing this action without prejudice for failure to serve process and denying her motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Sewell v. Washington Metro. Area Transit Auth., No. 8:1..
More
UNPUBLISHED
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Starsha Sewell appeals the district court's orders dismissing this action without prejudice for failure to serve process and denying her motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Sewell v. Washington Metro. Area Transit Auth., No. 8:15-cv-01334-TDC (D. Md. Oct. 22 & Nov. 2, 2015). We deny the motions to transfer and to strike the Defendant's response. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Source: Leagle
