KILLIAN v. COLVIN, CIV-14-209-C. (2015)
Court: District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Number: infdco20150219c41
Visitors: 14
Filed: Feb. 18, 2015
Latest Update: Feb. 18, 2015
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ROBIN J. CAUTHRON, District Judge. This action for judicial review of the Commissioner's denial of supplemental security income benefits was referred for initial proceedings to United States Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell, consistent with 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B). Judge Purcell entered a Report and Recommendation on January 15, 2015, recommending that the decision of the Commissioner be affirmed. Plaintiff, through counsel, has timely filed an objecti
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ROBIN J. CAUTHRON, District Judge. This action for judicial review of the Commissioner's denial of supplemental security income benefits was referred for initial proceedings to United States Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell, consistent with 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B). Judge Purcell entered a Report and Recommendation on January 15, 2015, recommending that the decision of the Commissioner be affirmed. Plaintiff, through counsel, has timely filed an objectio..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
ROBIN J. CAUTHRON, District Judge.
This action for judicial review of the Commissioner's denial of supplemental security income benefits was referred for initial proceedings to United States Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell, consistent with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). Judge Purcell entered a Report and Recommendation on January 15, 2015, recommending that the decision of the Commissioner be affirmed. Plaintiff, through counsel, has timely filed an objection to this report, and the Court therefore considers the matter de novo.
In his thorough and well-reasoned Report and Recommendation, Judge Purcell sets out the relevant facts and prevailing law, and no purpose would be served to repeat those here. In objection, Plaintiff merely restates the conclusions and legal argument originally asserted, and raises no issue not fully and accurately addressed and rejected by the Magistrate Judge.
Accordingly, the Court adopts, in its entirety, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and for the reasons stated therein, the decision of the Commissioner in this case is affirmed. A judgment will enter accordingly.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
