U.S. v. SUTHERLAND, 2:10-cr-0356-LDG-LRL. (2012)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20120120b47
Visitors: 13
Filed: Jan. 19, 2012
Latest Update: Jan. 19, 2012
Summary: ORDER LLOYD D. GEORGE, District Judge. Regarding the admissibility of documents contained in the government's production in September 2011, the tentative hearing scheduled for Friday, January 20, 2012, will not be necessary. The supplemental briefs filed by defendants Sutherland (#240) and Nunes (#239) reargue the materiality issues decided by the court on September 16, 2011, and do not specifically identify new documents not subject to it. Of course, rulings on motions in limine are subject
Summary: ORDER LLOYD D. GEORGE, District Judge. Regarding the admissibility of documents contained in the government's production in September 2011, the tentative hearing scheduled for Friday, January 20, 2012, will not be necessary. The supplemental briefs filed by defendants Sutherland (#240) and Nunes (#239) reargue the materiality issues decided by the court on September 16, 2011, and do not specifically identify new documents not subject to it. Of course, rulings on motions in limine are subject t..
More
ORDER
LLOYD D. GEORGE, District Judge.
Regarding the admissibility of documents contained in the government's production in September 2011, the tentative hearing scheduled for Friday, January 20, 2012, will not be necessary. The supplemental briefs filed by defendants Sutherland (#240) and Nunes (#239) reargue the materiality issues decided by the court on September 16, 2011, and do not specifically identify new documents not subject to it. Of course, rulings on motions in limine are subject to reconsideration given developments during trial.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
