HIRSCH v. 725 ASSOCIATES, 10 Civ. 9499 (LGS). (2014)
Court: District Court, S.D. New York
Number: infdco20140925801
Visitors: 2
Filed: Sep. 19, 2014
Latest Update: Sep. 19, 2014
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER LORNA G. SCHOFIELD, District Judge. WHEREAS, on August 13, 2014, Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint was dismissed with leave to file a Third Amended Complaint by September 9, 2014; WHEREAS, in the same opinion, Plaintiff's motion to dismiss Defendant's counterclaim for attorneys' fees was denied; WHEREAS, Plaintiff has not filed a Third Amended Complaint; it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff's claims against Defendant are dismissed with prejudice. The parties are advise
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER LORNA G. SCHOFIELD, District Judge. WHEREAS, on August 13, 2014, Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint was dismissed with leave to file a Third Amended Complaint by September 9, 2014; WHEREAS, in the same opinion, Plaintiff's motion to dismiss Defendant's counterclaim for attorneys' fees was denied; WHEREAS, Plaintiff has not filed a Third Amended Complaint; it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff's claims against Defendant are dismissed with prejudice. The parties are advised..
More
OPINION AND ORDER
LORNA G. SCHOFIELD, District Judge.
WHEREAS, on August 13, 2014, Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint was dismissed with leave to file a Third Amended Complaint by September 9, 2014;
WHEREAS, in the same opinion, Plaintiff's motion to dismiss Defendant's counterclaim for attorneys' fees was denied;
WHEREAS, Plaintiff has not filed a Third Amended Complaint; it is hereby
ORDERED that Plaintiff's claims against Defendant are dismissed with prejudice.
The parties are advised that, by separate order, the matter will be referred to a Magistrate Judge for a report and recommendation on the disposition of Defendant's counterclaim.
Source: Leagle
