AVENDANO v. SECURITY CONSULTANTS GROUP, INC., 3:13-cv-00168-HDM-VPC. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20151019a17
Visitors: 14
Filed: Oct. 15, 2015
Latest Update: Oct. 15, 2015
Summary: ORDER HOWARD D. McKIBBEN , District Judge . On October 14, 2015, plaintiffs filed a motion to seal exhibits to their responses in opposition to the motions for summary judgment (#238). The sole reason plaintiffs provided for sealing Exhibit Nos. 30, 31, and 45 is that they were "designated as confidential by either the Union (Ex. 45) or Corporate Defendants (Exs. 30-31)." #238 at 3. Defendants shall have until October 21, 2015, to file a response to plaintiffs' motion to seal that sets out
Summary: ORDER HOWARD D. McKIBBEN , District Judge . On October 14, 2015, plaintiffs filed a motion to seal exhibits to their responses in opposition to the motions for summary judgment (#238). The sole reason plaintiffs provided for sealing Exhibit Nos. 30, 31, and 45 is that they were "designated as confidential by either the Union (Ex. 45) or Corporate Defendants (Exs. 30-31)." #238 at 3. Defendants shall have until October 21, 2015, to file a response to plaintiffs' motion to seal that sets out ..
More
ORDER
HOWARD D. McKIBBEN, District Judge.
On October 14, 2015, plaintiffs filed a motion to seal exhibits to their responses in opposition to the motions for summary judgment (#238). The sole reason plaintiffs provided for sealing Exhibit Nos. 30, 31, and 45 is that they were "designated as confidential by either the Union (Ex. 45) or Corporate Defendants (Exs. 30-31)." #238 at 3.
Defendants shall have until October 21, 2015, to file a response to plaintiffs' motion to seal that sets out the compelling reasons justifying the sealing of the exhibits, as well as whether the exhibits can be redacted as opposed to sealed in their entirety. The exhibits will remain sealed at this time. Failure to file a response no later than October 21, 2015, may result in an order unsealing the exhibits.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
