5035 VILLAGE TRUST v. DURAZO, 2:15-cv-00747-GMN-NJK. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20160223b84
Visitors: 9
Filed: Feb. 22, 2016
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2016
Summary: ORDER NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Pending before the Court is a motion to stay discovery pending resolution of the pending motion to consolidate. Docket No. 63. The motion to stay was filed on February 2, 2016, so any response was due by February 19, 2016. See Local Rule 7-2(b); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d). To date, no response has been filed and the Court GRANTS the motion as unopposed. See Local Rule 7-2(d). In the event that resolution of the motion to consolidate does
Summary: ORDER NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Pending before the Court is a motion to stay discovery pending resolution of the pending motion to consolidate. Docket No. 63. The motion to stay was filed on February 2, 2016, so any response was due by February 19, 2016. See Local Rule 7-2(b); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d). To date, no response has been filed and the Court GRANTS the motion as unopposed. See Local Rule 7-2(d). In the event that resolution of the motion to consolidate does n..
More
ORDER
NANCY J. KOPPE, Magistrate Judge.
Pending before the Court is a motion to stay discovery pending resolution of the pending motion to consolidate. Docket No. 63. The motion to stay was filed on February 2, 2016, so any response was due by February 19, 2016. See Local Rule 7-2(b); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d). To date, no response has been filed and the Court GRANTS the motion as unopposed. See Local Rule 7-2(d). In the event that resolution of the motion to consolidate does not result in the termination of this case, the parties shall file a proposed discovery plan within 7 days of the issuance of that order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
