Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

In re Lidoderm Antitrust Litigation, 14-md-02521-WHO. (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20150526c06 Visitors: 15
Filed: May 22, 2015
Latest Update: May 22, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS OR STAY AMENDED COMPLAINT OF WALGREEN CO. ET AL. WILLIAM H. ORRICK , District Judge . Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, Defendants Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Watson Laboratories, Inc., and Actavis, plc (together, "Watson"); Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. ("Endo"); and Teikoku Pharma USA and Teukoku Seiyaku Co. (together "Teikoku") (collectively "Defendants") and Plaintiffs Walgreen Co., The Kroge
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS OR STAY AMENDED COMPLAINT OF WALGREEN CO. ET AL.

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, Defendants Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Watson Laboratories, Inc., and Actavis, plc (together, "Watson"); Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. ("Endo"); and Teikoku Pharma USA and Teukoku Seiyaku Co. (together "Teikoku") (collectively "Defendants") and Plaintiffs Walgreen Co., The Kroger Co., Safeway Inc., HEB Grocery Company L.P., and Albertson's LLC stipulate that, subject to the Court's approval, Defendants may receive an extension of time to file Defendants' Reply In Support of Defendants' Joint Motion to Dismiss or Stay the Amended Complaint of Walgreen Co. et al.

The Reply is currently due on May 29, 2015, but due to the long Memorial Day weekend starting on May 22, 2015, Defendants have requested, and Plaintiffs do not object to, a one-week extension to June 5, 2015, to allow Defendants to prepare their Reply.

The parties have not previously sought time modifications in this case, except for a stipulation to extend the time to complete a Rule 26(f) conference (which the Court granted, ECF No. 119), and an extension on a prior motion to dismiss briefing schedule (which the Court granted, ECF No. 98). The requested extension will not affect the schedule in this case, or the hearing for the motion, which is currently scheduled for July 8, 2015.

ORDER

The Court, having considered the stipulation to extend time for Defendants to file their Reply in support of Defendants' Joint Motion to Dismiss or Stay the Amended Complaint of Walgreen Co. et al., finds that good cause exists to grant the extension, and hereby orders that the stipulation is GRANTED. Defendants' Reply is due on June 5, 2015.

PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer