BERGMAN v. U.S., 2:10-cv-00111-JCM-PAL. (2012)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20120130961
Visitors: 4
Filed: Jan. 25, 2012
Latest Update: Jan. 25, 2012
Summary: ORDER (Mot for Relief from Sett Conf — Dkt. #35) PEGGY A. LEEN, Magistrate Judge. Before the court is Defendant's Motion for Relief from Requirement that Individual with Full Settlement Authority Attend the Settlement Conference (Dkt. #35). Having considered Defendant's motion, and for good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Relief from Requirement that Individual with Full Settlement Authority Attend the Settlement Conference (Dkt. #35) is GRANTED, and Defendant's re
Summary: ORDER (Mot for Relief from Sett Conf — Dkt. #35) PEGGY A. LEEN, Magistrate Judge. Before the court is Defendant's Motion for Relief from Requirement that Individual with Full Settlement Authority Attend the Settlement Conference (Dkt. #35). Having considered Defendant's motion, and for good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Relief from Requirement that Individual with Full Settlement Authority Attend the Settlement Conference (Dkt. #35) is GRANTED, and Defendant's rep..
More
ORDER
(Mot for Relief from Sett Conf — Dkt. #35)
PEGGY A. LEEN, Magistrate Judge.
Before the court is Defendant's Motion for Relief from Requirement that Individual with Full Settlement Authority Attend the Settlement Conference (Dkt. #35). Having considered Defendant's motion, and for good cause shown,
IT IS ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Relief from Requirement that Individual with Full Settlement Authority Attend the Settlement Conference (Dkt. #35) is GRANTED, and Defendant's representative with full settlement authority shall not be required to be personally present, provided the person is fully prepared to address the merits of the case and available for telephone consultation for the duration of the settlement conference.
Source: Leagle
