CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTION v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, 08-1481 (PLF). (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Columbia
Number: infdco20140925a61
Visitors: 16
Filed: Sep. 24, 2014
Latest Update: Sep. 24, 2014
Summary: ORDER PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge. For the reasons stated in the accompanying Opinion issued this same day, it is hereby ORDERED that defendant's renewed motion for summary judgment [Dkt. No. 65] is GRANTED; it is FURTHER ORDERED that defendant's motion for reconsideration [Dkt. No. 55] is DENIED as moot; and it is FURTHER ORDERED that the complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court shall remove this case from the docket of this Court. This is a final appealable order
Summary: ORDER PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge. For the reasons stated in the accompanying Opinion issued this same day, it is hereby ORDERED that defendant's renewed motion for summary judgment [Dkt. No. 65] is GRANTED; it is FURTHER ORDERED that defendant's motion for reconsideration [Dkt. No. 55] is DENIED as moot; and it is FURTHER ORDERED that the complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court shall remove this case from the docket of this Court. This is a final appealable order...
More
ORDER
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
For the reasons stated in the accompanying Opinion issued this same day, it is hereby
ORDERED that defendant's renewed motion for summary judgment [Dkt. No. 65] is GRANTED; it is
FURTHER ORDERED that defendant's motion for reconsideration [Dkt. No. 55] is DENIED as moot; and it is
FURTHER ORDERED that the complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court shall remove this case from the docket of this Court. This is a final appealable order. See FED. R. APP. P. 4(a).
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
