GAXIOLA v. SAYRE, 3:13-CV-01989-WHA (PR). (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20170517a92
Filed: May 16, 2017
Latest Update: May 16, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Joseph E. Gaxiola ("Plaintiff") and Defendants Dr. Michael Sayre, Family Nurse Practitioner Sue Risenhoover (collectively, "Defendants"), acting through their attorneys, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 1. Plaintiff dismisses with prejudice all claims against Defendants. 2. Defendants have n
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Joseph E. Gaxiola ("Plaintiff") and Defendants Dr. Michael Sayre, Family Nurse Practitioner Sue Risenhoover (collectively, "Defendants"), acting through their attorneys, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 1. Plaintiff dismisses with prejudice all claims against Defendants. 2. Defendants have no..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge.
Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Joseph E. Gaxiola ("Plaintiff") and Defendants Dr. Michael Sayre, Family Nurse Practitioner Sue Risenhoover (collectively, "Defendants"), acting through their attorneys, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
1. Plaintiff dismisses with prejudice all claims against Defendants.
2. Defendants have no counter claims against Plaintiff.
3. Each party is to bear their own costs and attorney's fees with regard to these dismissed claims.
[PROPOSED] ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
1 In accordance with Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I, Brett M. Sandford, hereby attest that I have the concurrence of Micah C.E. Osgood in the filing of this stipulation. /s/Brett M. Sandford.
Source: Leagle
