Filed: Aug. 29, 2017
Latest Update: Aug. 29, 2017
Summary: JOINT APPLICATION AND STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE AND VACATUR OF ARBITRATION AWARD; ORDER THEREON KIMBERLY J. MUELLER , District Judge . The parties to this action, acting through counsel, and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) hereby jointly apply for and request, in consideration of a negotiated settlement executed by them, for the Court to: (1) dismiss this action with prejudice; and (2) order a stipulated vacatur of the November 16, 2016
Summary: JOINT APPLICATION AND STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE AND VACATUR OF ARBITRATION AWARD; ORDER THEREON KIMBERLY J. MUELLER , District Judge . The parties to this action, acting through counsel, and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) hereby jointly apply for and request, in consideration of a negotiated settlement executed by them, for the Court to: (1) dismiss this action with prejudice; and (2) order a stipulated vacatur of the November 16, 2016 A..
More
JOINT APPLICATION AND STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE AND VACATUR OF ARBITRATION AWARD; ORDER THEREON
KIMBERLY J. MUELLER, District Judge.
The parties to this action, acting through counsel, and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) hereby jointly apply for and request, in consideration of a negotiated settlement executed by them, for the Court to: (1) dismiss this action with prejudice; and (2) order a stipulated vacatur of the November 16, 2016 Arbitration Award Entered by the DFA of California in the Arbitration captioned Grower Direct Nut Co., Inc. v. International Foodsource, LLC, DFA No. 423 (the "Arbitration Award") with prejudice, with each party to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs.
The purpose of this Joint Application and Stipulation is to place the parties in the same position they would be if the Court granted International Foodsource, LLC's ("IFS") motion to vacate the Arbitration Award (ECF Document No. 9), all in accordance with and in furtherance of a Settlement Agreement between the parties and consistent with the interest of justice.
In support of this Joint Application and Stipulation, the Parties state:
1. In December, 2015, Grower Direct Nut Co., Inc. ("Grower Direct") filed a Demand For Arbitration with the DFA of California (the "DFA") wherein Grower Direct alleged that IFS breached contracts numbered 14922 and 14923 with Grower Direct by failing to purchase walnuts within the time provided under the contracts (the "Arbitration");
2. On or about May 2, 2016, IFS filed a Complaint in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Morris County, captioned International Foodsource, LLC v. Grower Direct Nut Co., Inc., which action was removed to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey and assigned docket number 16-cv-3140 (the "New Jersey Action"). IFS alleged in the New Jersey Action that the arbitration clause was unenforceable and that Grower Direct made certain misrepresentations to IFS;
3. IFS filed an application to stay the Arbitration and Grower Direct filed a motion to compel Arbitration, and by Order dated August 3, 2016, the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey stayed the New Jersey Action and ordered the parties to proceed to Arbitration;
4. On November 16, 2016, the Arbitration Award was entered in favor of Grower Direct against IFS;
5. Grower Direct filed this Action to confirm the Arbitration Award and IFS moved in this Action to vacate the Arbitration Award on the grounds, among other things, that the Arbitration Award was entered in violation of the Federal Arbitration Act because, among other things: (a) the DFA failed to conduct a hearing; (b) the DFA entered its Arbitration Award at least in part based on ex parte evidence, arguments, and communications; and (c) the DFA Panel was composed entirely of DFA members (where Grower Direct is a DFA member, but IFS is not);
6. The Parties participated in a mediation before Dana Welch, Esq. on April 19, 2017; wherein they reached a settlement in principle, and executed a confidential Settlement Agreement on May 15, 2017;
7. The Parties agree that the vacatur of the Arbitration Award will place the parties in the same position they would be if IFS's motion to vacate were granted in accordance with and in furtherance of the Settlement Agreement of the parties;
8. The Parties agree that the Arbitration Award should be vacated and should not be construed to have any res judicata or collateral estoppel effect;
9. Vacatur of the Arbitration Award pursuant to this Joint Application and Stipulation will obviate any additional briefing by the parties and conserve judicial resources;
10. No non-parties nor the public will be adversely affected by the vacatur of the Arbitration Award; and
11. The relief sought is consistent with applicable principles of California law.
This Joint Application is made in connection with the settlement between the parties and for the purposes set forth above. The Parties are willing to furnish the Court additional briefing, analysis, or information (including the provision of the Confidential Settlement Agreement for in camera review) as the Court may request in order to satisfy itself that the requested vacatur of the Arbitration Award is in the interest of justice and consistent with governing principles of California law.
SO STIPULATED:
ORDER
The parties hereto having filed a "Joint Application and Stipulation for Dismissal of Action with Prejudice and Vacatur of Arbitration Award"; the Court having had the opportunity to review the merits of the application; and finding that the interests of non-parties or the public will not be adversely affected by the vacatur of the Arbitration Award; and that the reasons of the parties for requesting vacatur of the Arbitration Award are consistent with the interests of justice and governing principles of California law; it is therefore ordered that: (i) the entire action is hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs; and (ii) the November 16, 2016 Arbitration Award entered by the DFA of California in the Arbitration captioned Grower Direct Nut Co., Inc. v. International Foodsource, LLC, DFA No. 423 is hereby vacated with prejudice and without costs.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
