Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

BRONSON v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON INC., 3:12-CV-04184-CRB. (2013)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20131125681 Visitors: 18
Filed: Nov. 22, 2013
Latest Update: Nov. 22, 2013
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER RESCHEDULING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE CHARLES R. BREYER, Judge. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2(a) and 6-1(b), Plaintiffs Barbara Bronson, Michael Fishman, and Alvin Kupperman ("Plaintiffs") and Defendants Johnson & Johnson and McNeil Nutritionals, LLC ("Defendants") hereby stipulate to the rescheduling of the Case Management Conference currently scheduled for January 17, 2014 at 8:30 a.m. The parties request that a new Case Management Conference be continued to
More

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER RESCHEDULING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

CHARLES R. BREYER, Judge.

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2(a) and 6-1(b), Plaintiffs Barbara Bronson, Michael Fishman, and Alvin Kupperman ("Plaintiffs") and Defendants Johnson & Johnson and McNeil Nutritionals, LLC ("Defendants") hereby stipulate to the rescheduling of the Case Management Conference currently scheduled for January 17, 2014 at 8:30 a.m.

The parties request that a new Case Management Conference be continued to January 31, 2014, and that the parties' obligations under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(f) be rescheduled accordingly. Assuming the Court grants the parties' stipulation, the parties' Case Management Statement will be due on January 24, 2014.

The basis for the request is to accommodate the schedules of counsel for both sides, which schedule otherwise conflicts with the current January 17, 2014 date. The Court previously granted a joint stipulation to extend time to respond to the complaint (Dkt. 14) and a joint stipulation to extend time to respond to the Second Amended Complaint (Dkt. 48). The parties also stipulated to extend the latter request (Dkt. 61). There have been no other schedule modifications in this case. The parties believe that rescheduling the Case Management Conference to January 31, 2014 will not prejudice the parties or significantly impact the ultimate schedule for resolution of the case.

This stipulation is made without prejudice to seek additional orders from the Court, subject to Court approval.

IT IS THEREFORE STIPULATED, by the parties through their respective counsel, as follows:

The Case Management Conference, currently scheduled for January 17, 2014, shall be taken off calendar and rescheduled for January 31, 2014.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Attestation Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5.1(i)

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5.1(i), I, Michael J. Stortz, hereby attest that I have obtained concurrence in the filing of this document from the other signatory to this document.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the law of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on November 22, 2013 at San Francisco, California.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer