PERCELLE v. PEARSON, 12-cv-05343-TEH (EDL). (2015)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20150723706
Visitors: 4
Filed: Jul. 21, 2015
Latest Update: Jul. 21, 2015
Summary: ORDER Re: Dkt. No. 204 ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE , Magistrate Judge . On June 26, 2015, Plaintiff filed a motion for leave to reopen the deposition of Defendant Pearson. As stated at the hearing, the Parties are ORDERED to file a joint letter attaching any documents that were produced to Plaintiff in May 2015 or later that Plaintiff contends demonstrate a need for reopening the deposition or that Defendant contends demonstrate that no such need exists. The filing may be under seal to the extent
Summary: ORDER Re: Dkt. No. 204 ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE , Magistrate Judge . On June 26, 2015, Plaintiff filed a motion for leave to reopen the deposition of Defendant Pearson. As stated at the hearing, the Parties are ORDERED to file a joint letter attaching any documents that were produced to Plaintiff in May 2015 or later that Plaintiff contends demonstrate a need for reopening the deposition or that Defendant contends demonstrate that no such need exists. The filing may be under seal to the extent t..
More
ORDER Re: Dkt. No. 204
ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE, Magistrate Judge.
On June 26, 2015, Plaintiff filed a motion for leave to reopen the deposition of Defendant Pearson. As stated at the hearing, the Parties are ORDERED to file a joint letter attaching any documents that were produced to Plaintiff in May 2015 or later that Plaintiff contends demonstrate a need for reopening the deposition or that Defendant contends demonstrate that no such need exists. The filing may be under seal to the extent that it contains attorneys' eyes only information. Each side may attach no more than ten documents. The joint letter shall contain no more than two pages of argument from each side explaining the basis for the Parties' contentions and shall be filed no later than August 14, 2015.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
