STIPULATION TO EXCLUDE TIME AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.

STIPULATION

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties to the above-referenced actions, as stated on the record at the status conference on November 29, 2017, that the time between November 29, 2017, and January 10, 2018, be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and (h)(7)(B). Excluding such time will allow defense counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv).

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

As explained on the record during the November 29, 2017, status conference, the Court finds that the exclusion of the period from November 29, 2017, to January 10, 2018, from the time limits applicable under 18 U.S.C. § 3161, is warranted; that the ends of justice served by the continuance outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in the prompt disposition of this criminal case; and that the failure to grant the requested exclusion of time would unreasonably deny defense counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence, and would result in a miscarriage of justice. See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv). Such time is also excludable due to a delay caused by trial with respect to other charges against the defendant. Id. § 3161(h)(1)(B).

IT IS SO ORDERED.