Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

BEAN v. PEARSON EDUCATION, INC., CV 11-8030-PCT-PGR. (2012)

Court: District Court, D. Arizona Number: infdco20120719684 Visitors: 21
Filed: Jul. 18, 2012
Latest Update: Jul. 18, 2012
Summary: ORDER PAUL G. ROSENBLATT, District Judge. Before the Court is Defendant's Motion for Leave to File Surreply in Further Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Compel. (Doc. 142.) Defendant asserts that Plaintiffs' reply contains new arguments and inaccurate information. ( Id. ) Plaintiffs' oppose the motion, arguing that the proposed surreply repeats Defendant's previous arguments and discusses documents produced since Plaintiffs filed their motion to compel. (Doc. 144 at 2.) The local rules make
More

ORDER

PAUL G. ROSENBLATT, District Judge.

Before the Court is Defendant's Motion for Leave to File Surreply in Further Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Compel. (Doc. 142.) Defendant asserts that Plaintiffs' reply contains new arguments and inaccurate information. (Id.) Plaintiffs' oppose the motion, arguing that the proposed surreply repeats Defendant's previous arguments and discusses documents produced since Plaintiffs filed their motion to compel. (Doc. 144 at 2.)

The local rules make no provision for the filing of surreplies, see LRCiv 7.2, and the Court finds that the discovery issues pending before it have been adequately briefed. The Court notes that it will not consider any issues or evidence identified for the first time in Plaintiffs' reply brief.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED denying Defendant's Motion for Leave to File Surreply (Doc. 142).

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer