RIDOLA v. STAY CAL SAN JOSE, LLC, 5:16-cv-2207-EJD. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20170616a07
Visitors: 15
Filed: Jun. 15, 2017
Latest Update: Jun. 15, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE EDWARD J. DAVILA , District Judge . Plaintiff Rachelle Ridola ("Plaintiff") and Defendants Stay Cal San Jose, LLC and Tri-Lin Holdings, LLC ("Defendants")(collectively, the Parties") hereby stipulate, pursuant to FRCP 41 (a)(1)(A)(ii) and FRCP 41 (a)(2), as follows: 1. This action shall be dismissed with prejudice against Defendants. 2. The Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the CONSENT DECREE (Dkt
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE EDWARD J. DAVILA , District Judge . Plaintiff Rachelle Ridola ("Plaintiff") and Defendants Stay Cal San Jose, LLC and Tri-Lin Holdings, LLC ("Defendants")(collectively, the Parties") hereby stipulate, pursuant to FRCP 41 (a)(1)(A)(ii) and FRCP 41 (a)(2), as follows: 1. This action shall be dismissed with prejudice against Defendants. 2. The Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the CONSENT DECREE (Dkt...
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
EDWARD J. DAVILA, District Judge.
Plaintiff Rachelle Ridola ("Plaintiff") and Defendants Stay Cal San Jose, LLC and Tri-Lin Holdings, LLC ("Defendants")(collectively, the Parties") hereby stipulate, pursuant to FRCP 41 (a)(1)(A)(ii) and FRCP 41 (a)(2), as follows:
1. This action shall be dismissed with prejudice against Defendants.
2. The Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the CONSENT DECREE (Dkt. No. 30) against Stay Cal San Jose, LLC only.
3. The Parties shall bear their own attorney fees and costs in the action.
FILER'S ATTESTATION
I hereby attest that on, I, Irene Karbelashvili, received the concurrence of the signatories in filing of this document.
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Having reviewed the above stipulation for dismissal by Plaintiff Rachelle Ridola on the one hand and Defendants Stay Cal San Jose, LLC and Tri-Ling Holdings, LLC, on the other hand, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. This action is dismissed with prejudice against Defendants.
2. The Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the CONSENT DECREE (Dkt. No. 30) against Stay Cal San Jose, LLC only.
3. The Parties shall bear their own attorney fees and costs in the action.
Source: Leagle
