ROMERO v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, 01-3894 (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20170906i06
Visitors: 6
Filed: Sep. 05, 2017
Latest Update: Sep. 05, 2017
Summary: ORDER MARK A. KEARNEY , District Judge . AND NOW, this 5th day of September 2017, upon considering Defendants' Motion for summary judgment on Craig Millison's retaliation claims (ECF Doc. No. 1172), Plaintiffs' Response (ECF Doc. No. 1180), Defendants' Reply (ECF Doc. No. 1190) and for reasons in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED Defendants' Motion (ECF Doc. No. 1172) is GRANTED as there are no genuine issues of material fact precluding the entry of judgment in favor of the D
Summary: ORDER MARK A. KEARNEY , District Judge . AND NOW, this 5th day of September 2017, upon considering Defendants' Motion for summary judgment on Craig Millison's retaliation claims (ECF Doc. No. 1172), Plaintiffs' Response (ECF Doc. No. 1180), Defendants' Reply (ECF Doc. No. 1190) and for reasons in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED Defendants' Motion (ECF Doc. No. 1172) is GRANTED as there are no genuine issues of material fact precluding the entry of judgment in favor of the De..
More
ORDER
MARK A. KEARNEY, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 5th day of September 2017, upon considering Defendants' Motion for summary judgment on Craig Millison's retaliation claims (ECF Doc. No. 1172), Plaintiffs' Response (ECF Doc. No. 1180), Defendants' Reply (ECF Doc. No. 1190) and for reasons in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED Defendants' Motion (ECF Doc. No. 1172) is GRANTED as there are no genuine issues of material fact precluding the entry of judgment in favor of the Defendants on Mr. Millison's retaliation claims in Counts XI and XII.
Source: Leagle
