STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXCLUDING TIME

JON S. TIGAR, District Judge.

During the parties' appearance on August 11, 2017, the Court set August 25, 2017, as the next date for a further status hearing. Counsel for defendant requested that time between August 11, 2017, and August 25, 2017, be excluded from any time limits applicable under 18 U.S.C. § 3161, for the purpose of effective preparation of counsel. See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv). The parties agree that the ends of justice served by granting such an exclusion of time outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A). At the August 11, 2017, hearing, the Court made findings consistent with that agreement and excluded time.

IT IS SO STIPULATED:

Attestation of Filer

In addition to myself, the other signatory to this document is Jerome Matthews. I attest that I have his permission to enter a conformed signature on his behalf and to file the document. Dated: August 11, 2017.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

As stated at the August 11, 2017 hearing, for the reasons stated above and at the August 11, 2017 hearing, the Court finds that exclusion from the time limits applicable under 18 U.S.C. § 3161 the period from August 11, 2017, through August 25, 2017, is warranted and that the ends of justice served by the continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A). The failure to grant the requested exclusion of time would deny counsel for the defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence, and would result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv).

IT IS SO ORDERED.