TriREME MEDICAL, LLC v. ANGIOSCORE, INC., 14-cv-02946-LB. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20160803782
Visitors: 4
Filed: Aug. 02, 2016
Latest Update: Aug. 02, 2016
Summary: ORDER ON CLAIM CONSTRUCTION [ECF No. 99] LAUREL BEELER , Magistrate Judge . ORDER The court hereby adopts the parties' agreed claim construction that is set out in ECF No. 99. See Patent L.R. 4-3. The parties state that they have no claim-construction disputes. (ECF No. 99 at 3; ECF No. 101 at 2 [ 17].) The court acknowledges the parties' identification of the terms in ECF No. 99 as "the most significant to the resolution of [this] case." See (ECF No. 99 at 3); Patent L.R. 4-3(c). Th
Summary: ORDER ON CLAIM CONSTRUCTION [ECF No. 99] LAUREL BEELER , Magistrate Judge . ORDER The court hereby adopts the parties' agreed claim construction that is set out in ECF No. 99. See Patent L.R. 4-3. The parties state that they have no claim-construction disputes. (ECF No. 99 at 3; ECF No. 101 at 2 [ 17].) The court acknowledges the parties' identification of the terms in ECF No. 99 as "the most significant to the resolution of [this] case." See (ECF No. 99 at 3); Patent L.R. 4-3(c). The..
More
ORDER ON CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
[ECF No. 99]
LAUREL BEELER, Magistrate Judge.
ORDER
The court hereby adopts the parties' agreed claim construction that is set out in ECF No. 99. See Patent L.R. 4-3. The parties state that they have no claim-construction disputes. (ECF No. 99 at 3; ECF No. 101 at 2 [¶ 17].) The court acknowledges the parties' identification of the terms in ECF No. 99 as "the most significant to the resolution of [this] case." See (ECF No. 99 at 3); Patent L.R. 4-3(c). The court accepts the parties' joint proposal (ECF No. 99 at 2 [¶ 17]) to remove from the calendar the previously scheduled claim-construction briefs and Markman hearing.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
