Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Hopgood v. Merrill Lynch, 94-1149 (1994)

Court: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Number: 94-1149 Visitors: 20
Filed: Sep. 20, 1994
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: 36 F.3d 1089, NOTICE: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 states unpublished opinions may be cited only in related cases.Philip D. HOPGOOD, et al., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v.MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE, FENNER AND SMITH, Defendant, Appellee., No. 94-1149, United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

36 F.3d 1089

NOTICE: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 states unpublished opinions may be cited only in related cases.
Philip D. HOPGOOD, et al., Plaintiffs, Appellants,
v.
MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE, FENNER AND SMITH, Defendant, Appellee.

No. 94-1149

United States Court of Appeals,
First Circuit.

September 19, 1994.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Jaime Pieras, Jr., U.S. District Judge ]

Harold D. Vicente with whom Vicente & Cuebas was on brief for appellants.

Carlos G. Latimer with whom Latimer, Biaggi, Rachid, Rodriguez-Suris & Godreau was on brief for appellees.

D. Puerto Rico

AFFIRMED.

Before Coffin and Campbell, Senior Circuit Judges, Keeton, Senior District Judge.*

Per Curiam.

1

Substantially for the same reasons set forth in the opinion of the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico in Hopgood v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, 839 F. Supp. 98 (D.Puerto Rico 1993), we affirm. Costs are awarded to the appellee.

*

Of the District of Massachusetts, sitting by designation

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer