Filed: Feb. 10, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 10, 2020
Summary: ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS TO AMEND, QUASH, AND EXTEND TIME MAXINE M. CHESNEY , District Judge . Before the Court are three motions: (1) plaintiff's Motion, filed December 27, 2019, "to File Amended Complaint"; (2) plaintiff's Motion, filed December 27, 2019, "to Quash Defendant's Motion"; and (3) plaintiff's Motion, filed January 6, 2020, "to Extend Time on Deadlines to Respond to Motions." On February 7, 2020, the Court held a Case Management Conference wherein it addressed the is
Summary: ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS TO AMEND, QUASH, AND EXTEND TIME MAXINE M. CHESNEY , District Judge . Before the Court are three motions: (1) plaintiff's Motion, filed December 27, 2019, "to File Amended Complaint"; (2) plaintiff's Motion, filed December 27, 2019, "to Quash Defendant's Motion"; and (3) plaintiff's Motion, filed January 6, 2020, "to Extend Time on Deadlines to Respond to Motions." On February 7, 2020, the Court held a Case Management Conference wherein it addressed the iss..
More
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS TO AMEND, QUASH, AND EXTEND TIME
MAXINE M. CHESNEY, District Judge.
Before the Court are three motions: (1) plaintiff's Motion, filed December 27, 2019, "to File Amended Complaint"; (2) plaintiff's Motion, filed December 27, 2019, "to Quash Defendant's Motion"; and (3) plaintiff's Motion, filed January 6, 2020, "to Extend Time on Deadlines to Respond to Motions."
On February 7, 2020, the Court held a Case Management Conference wherein it addressed the issues raised in plaintiff's motions to quash and to extend time, and, accordingly, said motions are hereby DENIED as moot. As to the motion to amend, plaintiff has failed to provide her proposed amended pleading, and, accordingly, the motion is hereby DENIED without prejudice. See Civil L.R. 10-1 (providing "[a]ny party filing or moving to file an amended pleading must reproduce the entire proposed pleading").
IT IS SO ORDERED.
