DUENAS v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, 3:12-cv-00714-CRB. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20170215b33
Visitors: 9
Filed: Feb. 14, 2017
Latest Update: Feb. 14, 2017
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL Re: Dkt. No. 34. CHARLES R. BREYER , District Judge . The parties hereto, by their counsel, having advised the court that they have agreed to a settlement of this cause, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this cause of action is dismissed without prejudice; provided, however that if any party hereto shall certify to this court, within ninety (90) days, with proof of service thereof, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered over, the foregoing o
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL Re: Dkt. No. 34. CHARLES R. BREYER , District Judge . The parties hereto, by their counsel, having advised the court that they have agreed to a settlement of this cause, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this cause of action is dismissed without prejudice; provided, however that if any party hereto shall certify to this court, within ninety (90) days, with proof of service thereof, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered over, the foregoing or..
More
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Re: Dkt. No. 34.
CHARLES R. BREYER, District Judge.
The parties hereto, by their counsel, having advised the court that they have agreed to a settlement of this cause, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this cause of action is dismissed without prejudice; provided, however that if any party hereto shall certify to this court, within ninety (90) days, with proof of service thereof, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered over, the foregoing order shall stand vacated and this cause shall forthwith be restored to the calendar to be set for trial.
If no certification is filed, after passage of ninety (90) days, the dismissal shall be with prejudice.
Source: Leagle
