U.S. EX REL. RYAN v. ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., 05-3450 (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20141028845
Visitors: 10
Filed: Oct. 22, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 22, 2014
Summary: ORDER ROBERT F. KELLY, Senior District Judge. AND NOW, this 22nd day of October, 2014, upon consideration of Relator Gursheel S. Dhillon's ("Dhillon"), pro se "Expedited Motion for Court Order to Allow in Camera Review of Court Record" (Doc. No. 62), and the Response in Opposition co-filed by Relators Peggy Ryan and Max Weathersby, and the Response in Opposition filed by the United States of America, it is hereby ORDERED that the following documents are UNSEALED : 1 1. The Court Order o
Summary: ORDER ROBERT F. KELLY, Senior District Judge. AND NOW, this 22nd day of October, 2014, upon consideration of Relator Gursheel S. Dhillon's ("Dhillon"), pro se "Expedited Motion for Court Order to Allow in Camera Review of Court Record" (Doc. No. 62), and the Response in Opposition co-filed by Relators Peggy Ryan and Max Weathersby, and the Response in Opposition filed by the United States of America, it is hereby ORDERED that the following documents are UNSEALED : 1 1. The Court Order of..
More
ORDER
ROBERT F. KELLY, Senior District Judge.
AND NOW, this 22nd day of October, 2014, upon consideration of Relator Gursheel S. Dhillon's ("Dhillon"), pro se "Expedited Motion for Court Order to Allow in Camera Review of Court Record" (Doc. No. 62), and the Response in Opposition co-filed by Relators Peggy Ryan and Max Weathersby, and the Response in Opposition filed by the United States of America, it is hereby ORDERED that the following documents are UNSEALED:1
1. The Court Order of September 19, 2005, granting an extension of the seal (Doc. 3);
2. The Court Order of March 14, 2006, re-assigning this case (Doc. 5);
3. The Court Order of September 15, 2006, relating to the seal (Doc. 6);
4. The State of Montana's Notice of Election to Decline Intervention (Doc. 9);
5. The Court Order of November 15, 2010, permitting limited disclosure of complaints to the Relators (Doc. 11);
6. The Pro Hac Vice applications and related Orders filed and entered in January and March 2011 (Docs. 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18); and
7. The Court Order of January 13, 2012, which permitted the limited disclosure of the complaints to Defendant Endo.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the following remain documents under SEAL:
1. The first Motion filed by the Government on September 15, 2005, for an extension of the seal and an extension of the evaluator period (Doc. 2);
2. The unopposed Motion filed by the Government on March 13, 2006, for an extension of the seal, and to place the matter in civil suspense (Doc. 4);
3. The ex parte application for limited disclosure of the complaint filed by the Government on November 15, 2010 (Doc. 10);
4. The ex parte application for limited disclosure of the complaint filed by the Government on November 29, 2010 (Doc. 19); and
5. Any and all other ex parte submissions and correspondence of the Government to this Court.
FootNotes
1. We note that all document numbers relate solely to 05-cv-3450.
Source: Leagle
