Pagani v. Buergar, 3:16-CV-00024-GCM. (2016)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20160524a71
Visitors: 2
Filed: May 20, 2016
Latest Update: May 20, 2016
Summary: ORDER GRAHAM C. MULLEN , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on its own motion. On April 7, 2016, Defendant filed a Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 11) and Memorandum in Support (Doc. No. 12). Plaintiff's response is currently due May 23, 2016. However, Plaintiff and Defendant disagree about whether Plaintiff is entitled to conduct discovery before filing his response. The Court set a status conference for June 1, 2016 in order to resolve this issue. After the status co
Summary: ORDER GRAHAM C. MULLEN , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on its own motion. On April 7, 2016, Defendant filed a Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 11) and Memorandum in Support (Doc. No. 12). Plaintiff's response is currently due May 23, 2016. However, Plaintiff and Defendant disagree about whether Plaintiff is entitled to conduct discovery before filing his response. The Court set a status conference for June 1, 2016 in order to resolve this issue. After the status con..
More
ORDER
GRAHAM C. MULLEN, District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on its own motion. On April 7, 2016, Defendant filed a Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 11) and Memorandum in Support (Doc. No. 12). Plaintiff's response is currently due May 23, 2016. However, Plaintiff and Defendant disagree about whether Plaintiff is entitled to conduct discovery before filing his response. The Court set a status conference for June 1, 2016 in order to resolve this issue. After the status conference, the Court will issue a scheduling order resetting the deadlines in accordance with discussions with counsel. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the deadline to respond to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment will be STAYED.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
